<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wistia at Work &#187; video length</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wistia.com/blog/tag/video-length/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wistia.com/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:55:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Does length matter? It does for video!</title>
		<link>http://wistia.com/blog/does-length-matter-it-does-for-video/</link>
		<comments>http://wistia.com/blog/does-length-matter-it-does-for-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Managing Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video length]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viewing habits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wistia.com/blog/?p=126500374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve always touted the message &#8220;shorter videos are better&#8221;. They tend to get straight to the point and hold attention better than a drawn-out message. We&#8217;ve certainly noticed measured improvements when tightening up our own marketing videos. But are longer videos inherently less engaging than shorter videos? Now that we have a wealth of video [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve always touted the message &#8220;shorter videos are better&#8221;. They tend to get straight to the point and hold attention better than a drawn-out message. We&#8217;ve certainly noticed measured improvements when tightening up our own marketing videos. But are longer videos inherently less engaging than shorter videos?</p>
<p>Now that we have a wealth of video tracking data at our fingertips, we thought we&#8217;d put the old &#8220;shorter is better&#8221; theory to the test.</p>
<h2>The Initial Test</h2>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-126500383" title="30v90" src="http://wistia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/30v901.png" alt="30v90" width="400" height="278" /></p>
<p>We worked with one of our customers who has been testing two variations of the same video. The red line in the graph above represents the engagement of their <span style="color: #ff0000;">30-second</span> video. The blue line is the engagement graph for a <span style="color: #0000ff;">90-second</span> video. It&#8217;s expected that these two videos would have different engagement graphs, but what&#8217;s odd is that the first 30 seconds of both videos are identical!</p>
<p>Even though viewers were exposed to the same exact content, the drop-off rate of the <span style="color: #0000ff;">90-second</span> video was much higher. By the end of the <span style="color: #ff0000;">30-second</span> video there were about double the number of viewers than at the same point in the <span style="color: #0000ff;">90-second video</span>.</p>
<h2>A Wider Look</h2>
<p>Our initial test got us thinking. Does this hold true on a larger scale? We decided to look at completion percentages across the thousands of videos we host.</p>
<address><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-126500428" title="viewingpercentage" src="http://wistia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/viewingpercentage.png" alt="viewingpercentage" width="460" height="244" /></address>
<p>We were right! Shorter videos are more engaging than longer videos, but there are some other unexpected trends. The average 30-second video was viewed 85% of the way through, while the average 2-minute video was viewed on average 50% of the way through. That is a very fast viewership drop-off. But what&#8217;s surprising is that the average viewing percentage stays quite consistent for 2-minute videos to 10-minute videos. That means the time spent watching is increasing almost proportionally with the video length during this period. Take a look:</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-126500427" title="minutesviewed" src="http://wistia.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/minutesviewed.png" alt="minutesviewed" width="460" height="237" /></p>
<h2>What does this mean?</h2>
<p>The data is quite clear, shorter videos are more engaging than longer videos. For videos 2 minutes and under, you should strive to make your content as short and punchy as possible to guarantee the highest engagement. If your video is 30 seconds or under, it&#8217;s very likely that most people will watch it all the way through.</p>
<p>If your message is more complex, be comfortable taking the time to explain it, but understand that half of your audience won&#8217;t make it to the end of the video. With this in mind, you would be well served to front-load your video with the most important parts of your message.</p>
<p>Understanding the relationship between video length and viewer engagement can help you ensure that your audience is getting the most out of your videos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wistia.com/blog/does-length-matter-it-does-for-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

